Narrative Summary:
SHORT DESCRIPTION: This project consists of two city blocks of plazas, courtyards, gardens, and site structures associated with new and existing dormitories, located 1 block from campus on College Avenue. It is the largest publicly accessible open space built by UC Berkeley in many decades, and renovates the original design completed by Lawrence Halprin, FASLA, with John Carl Warnecke Architects in 1959.
OVERVIEW: Completed in April of 2005, this $130,000,000 (hard and soft cost) two block student housing project
for U.C. Berkeley consists of the demolition of two 1959 dining halls to make way for the addition of four
new dormitory buildings housing 900 students. Located 1 block from the south edge of campus and across the
street from the University Art Museum, each city block site has 4 existing 10-story dormitories, originally
designed by Lawrence Halprin, FASLA, with John Carl Warnecke Architects in 1959. This Landscape Architect worked
with the University to preserve a number of original stone walls, terraces, and concrete canopies from the
original work, lacing together old and new to resolve grade changes at the perimeter of the new plaza and
surrounding streets, when wiping the site clean would have been expedient. College Avenue, previously closed
to pedestrians for the entire block, has become the new major entrance to the site.
DESIGN PARAMETERS: Approximately 1/2 of the site work is on top of structure remaining
from the demolished dining halls, and some plaza areas could not support loading. There is approximately 23
feet of grade change on each site, so that circulation had to be re-conceptualized for accessibility. Formal
constraints were imposed by site utilities, which had been renovated twice before as part of accessibility
and seismic improvements. The project proceeded on a fast track schedule with early and late working drawing
packages proceeding simultaneously. The site component took 2-½ years from design start to completion of construction,
and was implemented while students continued to live in the existing 8 dormitory buildings.
DESIGN CONCEPTS: Nicknamed "The Bowtie" by the University, the parti both integrates and expresses the imperatives
of University program, sun angles, accessibility, and site circulation. Central to this geometry was the underlying
"logic" of complex infrastructure, both from surrounding streets and the basements beneath. Conceptually and
pragmatically, the design efficiently integrates infrastructure, architecture, and landscape in plan and section. The
bowtie concept is expressed in section with 2 galvanized steel bike shelters with integral stage and wood benches
that face each other across the plan intersection of the bowtie. Metal roofs, whose slopes match the angles
on the ground plane, sectionally reinforce the bowtie form, particularly as seen from the rooms above, providing
volumetric variation to a potentially flat plaza. Gently sloping planes, or tilted terraces, eliminate the need
for dedicated accessibility ramps at all 10 sidewalk entries. Dedicated ramps at existing buildings were
simplified and 8 of the 16 were removed altogether by design.
Sloping, south facing lawns encourage passive use, and concrete planter walls slope to allow
greater soil depth for trees over basement columns. To reinforce the sectional idea of ramping forms, the
plan has gently skewed lines that avoid obstructions, enlarge lawn areas, and capture structural columns below
and remnants of an elevator shaft that allow for large trees on the structure. This serves to unify the site
with a formal language that focuses on spatial and sectional volumes, defined through the use of a sculpted ground
plane, with diaphanous plantings and structures.
Durability in materials and finishes was addressed by further unifying the complicated site with
a monochromatic palette of warm grey and tan tones. Galvanized steel and galvalume roofs for bike shelters,
lights, furnishings and rails, sandblasted concrete paving and walls, unit pavers on sand, silver weathered
Alaskan yellow cedar, and a checkerboard of pedestal pavers sets off the brightly colored and highly textured
buildings and plant materials, while tying in with the corrugated metal and concrete structure. The bike shelters,
too big to "mitigate" have become the central feature of the plaza, and with the bamboo filled, sunken lightcourts,
are glowing lanterns at night.
PLANTING DESIGN: The planting design gives priority to volumetric definition and permanence through the use
of natives firstly, to vernacular plantings secondly (meaning plants naturalized to the area through 100
years or more of use) and finally to a pan-asian palette of plantings for tight urban spaces. Because half the
landscape is on structure, and because of the shadows cast by the tall buildings combined with the need for
sunny outdoor space for an extraordinarily dense student population, the planting design needed to be responsive
and detailed. Lawns that do not require soil depth (and are the landscape type most used by students on campus)
are located in the sunny areas over structure on the north side of the courtyards. Wherever there are planting
areas on grade, the unlimited soil depth is used for tall trees to enclose the plaza and mediate the building
height. Therefore either end of the bowtie plaza is bracketed by our native redwoods, framed with the native
bigleaf maple, honeylocust and sycamore, under-planted with clump grasses, western sword ferns, redwood sorrel,
rushes and Japanese anemones. In shade areas over structure, Unit 1 has a geometric Asian palette of bamboo, Japanese
maples, dogwood, palmgrass and iris while Unit 2 has the more classic flowering cherries, maples, azaleas,
and hellebores.
At each tilted terrace/entry court (4 per site) there is a different type of non-aggressive
vertical eucalyptus that can tolerate the urban conditions and partial shade cast by the tall buildings. East/West
street frontages have been replanted with street trees, grates and guards according to the City of Berkeley
program.
The goal has been to create a place of simplicity and serenity that is available for students
as a refuge from academic pressures and the urban setting.
|
Project Resources |
|
|
Campus Landscape
Architect:
Dave Johnson and Jim Horner, Capital Projects
Campus Architect:
Capital Projects
Architect:
Esherick Homsey Dodge & Davis
Structural Engineer:
Rutherford and Chekene |
|
|
|
Lighting
Design:
Auerbach & Glasow
General Contractor:
Rudolph and Sletten
Landscape Contractor:
Valley Crest |
|
|
|
|